The Bullshit Pandemic: Why Harry Frankfurt’s Genius Explains Everything Now
Ever feel like conversations are going nowhere, not because people are lying, but because they just don’t care about what’s real? Harry Frankfurt’s ‘On Bullshit’ is the indispensable guide to this modern malaise, and I want to show you why it’s the most urgent concept we need to grasp to reclaim our collective sanity. Let’s dive in.
Why Truth Feels Like a Foreign Language
Have you ever felt it? That profound sense of frustration when you’re trying to have a serious conversation, maybe about politics, maybe about climate change, or even just what happened last week, and it feels like the other person isn’t even playing by the same rules? It’s not that they’re necessarily lying to you, at least not in the traditional sense. It’s something deeper, more unsettling. It’s as if the very concept of ‘truth’ has become optional, secondary to something else entirely. This isn’t a new feeling for me, but it’s one that has intensified dramatically over the past few years. And it’s precisely this feeling that Harry Frankfurt, a brilliant philosopher, so eloquently articulated decades ago, offering us a crucial lens through which to understand our current predicament. His work, ‘On Bullshit,’ feels more relevant today than ever before, almost prophetic in its insights into the nature of modern communication.
Harry Frankfurt, My Guru on Clarity
When I first encountered Harry Frankfurt’s essay ‘On Bullshit,’ it was like a light switch flipped on in my mind. Here was someone articulating precisely what I had been struggling to define. Frankfurt, a philosopher at Princeton, didn’t set out to write a viral hit, but his incisive analysis of the difference between lying and bullshitting has become one of the most cited and discussed philosophical texts of our time. He didn’t invent the word ‘bullshit,’ of course, but he gave it a philosophical weight and precision it desperately needed. For me, his work provided not just a definition, but a profound understanding of a pervasive cultural illness. It helped me move beyond merely lamenting ‘lies’ to diagnosing the deeper, more corrosive problem: the casual disregard for truth itself. And once you see it, you start seeing it everywhere.
Not a Lie, But Worse: Understanding the Bullshit Mechanism
So, what’s the big deal? Why is bullshit worse than a lie? Frankfurt explains it beautifully. A liar knows the truth and deliberately tries to hide it or mislead you. They’re still operating within a framework where truth matters, even if they’re subverting it. The bullshitter, however, couldn’t care less about the truth. Their statements aren’t designed to be true or false; they’re designed to achieve some other goal: to impress, to persuade, to project an image, to signal group allegiance, or simply to fill the air with noise. The bullshitter’s focus is entirely on effect, not on factual accuracy. This indifference is what makes it so corrosive. If a liar exists, they confirm that truth exists and is worth concealing. A bullshitter, by contrast, operates as if truth is irrelevant, optional, or simply too much trouble to bother with. This fundamentally undermines the very possibility of rational discourse and shared reality.
The fundamental problem with bullshit is not that it misrepresents reality, but that it bypasses the very question of reality altogether, rendering truth obsolete.
– Hannah Arendt (paraphrased from her work on totalitarianism and truth)
That Familiar Feeling: Bullshit in Our Everyday Lives (and Minds)
Once you understand Frankfurt’s distinction, you start to see the ‘bullshit pandemic’ everywhere. Think about political rhetoric that sounds good but lacks any substantive policy details. Think about marketing claims that promise everything but deliver nothing concrete. Think about social media posts where people offer strong opinions on subjects they clearly haven’t researched, their primary goal being to signal their virtue or identity to their followers. It’s in corporate statements that use jargon to obscure rather than clarify. It’s in the constant performance of self-interest masquerading as public service. We often find ourselves wading through oceans of this stuff, feeling vaguely uneasy, but unable to pinpoint why. It’s because the speakers aren’t even trying to get it right; they’re just trying to get a reaction. The real danger isn’t deception, but the systematic erosion of our capacity to care about what’s real. This erosion hollows out our conversations, our institutions, and ultimately, our shared understanding of the world.
Finding Our Way Back to What’s Real
So, what can we do about this? It starts with personal responsibility. First, we need to cultivate a fierce commitment to truth in our own communication. Before we speak or share, we should ask ourselves: ‘Am I genuinely concerned with the truth of what I’m saying, or am I just trying to achieve some other effect?’ Second, we need to develop a sharper critical eye for others’ communication. Instead of just asking ‘Is this true or false?’, we should also ask, ‘Does this speaker even care if this is true or false?’ This shift in perspective can illuminate the true nature of the discourse around us. It’s about demanding intellectual rigor from ourselves and from those who seek our attention. It’s about recognizing that ignoring the question of truth isn’t benign; it’s an active participation in the degradation of our collective reality. Frankfurt didn’t just give us a definition; he gave us a call to arms for intellectual honesty.
The true tragedy is not that we suffer, but that we are in denial about our suffering.
– Slavoj Žižek
Go Deeper
Step beyond the surface. Unlock The Third Citizen’s full library of deep guides and frameworks — now with 10% off the annual plan for new members.
Join the Conversation: How do you spot it?
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this. Where do you see the ‘bullshit pandemic’ playing out most acutely in your life or in public discourse? What strategies do you use to cut through the noise and identify when someone is simply indifferent to the truth? Share your insights and experiences in the comments below. Let’s build a community that values sincerity about truth, not just its strategic manipulation. Your input helps all of us navigate this complex world more thoughtfully and rigorously. Let’s keep the conversation going and push back against the tide of indifference.




The best bullshitters are selectively indifferent to the truth. If the truth works better than a lie, they are perfectly happy to use it, but seldom all of it.
In the securities law there is a rule prohibiting bullshitting by omission making it a violation "to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading."
The best bullshitters are prepared for pushback, and will lie with utter conviction. This is their normal state of mind. Ever alert.